 |
Vietnam’s legal system is currently lacking an institutional mechanism for carbon labelling, photo Le Toan |
The Department of Climate Change (DCC), under the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, is working with international partners and consultants to implement voluntary carbon labelling for business products in Vietnam.
The initiative, sponsored by the Energy Transition Partnership, is to be carried out from now to May 2026. The target is to provide technical input and necessary support for the DCC to design and introduce a voluntary carbon labelling scheme, and prepare the private sector for carbon accounting and carbon emission reduction through a pilot programme in selected sectors.
It will assess the existing domestic policy framework and infrastructure and identify what is needed further for effective voluntary carbon labelling in Vietnam. Lessons learnt from international case studies will be used to propose enabling policies, regulations, and capacity-building measures for the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment.
According to the multidisciplinary consulting company RCEE-NIRAS, the programme will propose a design for voluntary carbon labelling, including technical components, certification and verification, institutional arrangements, implementation procedures, and capacity-building.
After that, the consultant unit will pilot the designed units in selected sectors based on a set of criteria. It will include awareness-raising, training, and communication activities to encourage the carbon labelling concept for Vietnam’s energy-intensive export sectors.
“Vietnam’s legal framework has no institutional mechanism for carbon labelling. The pilot implementation of a carbon labelling programme, based on voluntary participation, contributes to enhancing capabilities and increasing competitive advantages for businesses. In terms of technical support, the implementing agency aims to develop policies to assist the private sector in building capacity for inventory, assessment, and other sustainable development efforts,” said Hoang Anh, an expert at RCEE-NIRAS.
It is anticipated that 11 industry groups or sub-sectors will be affected by international mechanisms such as the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which include energy-intensive and high-emission industries, as well as sectors currently impacted by energy transition policies.
“Thus, we are considering selecting these industries for qualitative and quantitative assessment. These industries include aluminium, cement, chemicals, electrical equipment, food processing, iron and steel, plastics, and more,” said Hoang Anh.
DCC deputy director Nguyen Tuan Quang said, “Carbon labelling will help reduce carbon leakage or carbon shifting between countries, which meets the demand of developed countries applying the CBAM. It will also be a solution to enhance the businesses’ competitive capacity in the context it is a short time before the EU imposes emission taxes.”
The transitional period for the CBAM began in October 2023 and will continue until the end of 2025. During this period, importers of goods must submit reports that include the carbon price due in the country of origin for the emissions. This primarily applies to goods with a high risk of carbon leakage, such as iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertilisers, electricity, and hydrogen.
After the transitional period, importers will be required to acquire certificates corresponding to the carbon price applicable under EU rules. After the transitional period, importers will be required to acquire certificates corresponding to the carbon price applicable under EU rules.
Voluntary carbon labelling has been implemented in many countries and has proven highly successful in guiding businesses and citizens to recognise the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions through smart production and consumption activities.
The PWC’s 2024 Voice of the Consumer Survey, which collected the perspectives of more than 20,000 consumers from over 30 countries and territories, indicated that consumers are willing to spend an average of 9.7 per cent more on sustainably produced or sourced goods, even as cost-of-living and inflationary concerns weigh.
The survey also suggested that more than 80 per cent of consumers said they are willing to pay more for sustainable produced or sourced goods. In terms of a price premium, some consumers are willing to pay on average 9.7 per cent more for goods that meet specific environmental criteria, including locally sourced, made from recycled or eco-friendly materials, produced in a supply chain with a lower carbon footprint, and more.
Sabine Durand-Hayes, global consumer markets leader of PwC France, said, “Consumers are increasingly feeling the squeeze of inflation and rising prices in essential goods such as groceries, however in that context, they are prioritising products that are sustainably produced and sourced. In the year ahead, companies must balance consumer affordability and environmental impact if they are to source and retain consumers.”
Around the world, many businesses have adopted carbon labelling and reaped significant benefits. In Japan, companies like Panasonic and Sony implemented this work for electronic products, boosting sales by meeting the demands of environmentally conscious consumers. Similarly, in Europe, major retailers such as Tesco and Marks & Spencer have applied carbon labelling to food products, enhancing brand image.
SIVAKUMAR Balasankari, consulting team leader NIRAS A/S Company
Carbon labelling is implemented in several markets around the world, such as the United States, EU, China, and Thailand. These labels combine CO2 measured labels, reduce packaging, and are carbon-neutral, with eco-labelling for food and drink products.
In France, the government has been experimenting with several schemes and passed a law for environmental labelling, meanwhile, in the US, a group of multinational corporations established a sustainability consortium to help suppliers to measure and reduce their environmental impact.
There are also private operators of carbon labelling schemes. For example, Walmart teamed up with the carbon disclosure project to require its suppliers to disclose their carbon emissions. They do not capture carbon embedded in individual products, and use self-reported surveys. Besides this, Casino-French supermarket has a life-cycle-based carbon label on 26 of its own products. It utilises a methodology developed by environmental consultancy Bio Intelligence.
These examples show that carbon labelling enhances transparency in product emissions and promotes sustainable consumption. Various international standards ensure credibility and consistency in carbon footprint assessments.
With different countries implementing voluntary and regulatory schemes tailored to their industries and environmental goals, stakeholder engagement, including government agencies, businesses, and consumers, is crucial for successful adoption.
I think that a well-balanced eco-labelling scheme must provide value exceeding costs to ensure long-term participation.
Dao Doan Duy, environmental safety and sustainability specialist PetroVietnam
The group is expanding low-emission energy sources by increasing the gas-to-oil production ratio, developing gas-to-power chains (Block B of the O Mon project) and importing liquefied natural gas to ensure gas supply for power generation (Nhon Trach 3-4).
In addition, the group also conducts carbon capture and storage by utilising depleted oil and gas fields, capturing CO2 from hard-to-abate sectors and developing hydrogen projects.
PetroVietnam also develops guideline documents for emission reduction in the oil and gas sector, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory, and monitoring, reporting, and verification for emission reduction, among others.
The group also conducts research on emission reduction roadmaps, carbon market participation potential, carbon footprint calculation, CO2 absorption from afforestation, methane emission reduction, and more.
We face several challenges during the process of implementing emission reduction solutions. For example, the auditing and certification of GHG inventory data are still struggling due to large enterprise scale, complex ownership structure, and diverse industries. Besides that, for complex emission sources that are difficult to measure, such as leaks and cold venting. Calculation data also still relies on estimates.
Thus, we see that to ensure authenticity and accuracy, emission reduction solutions must be accompanied by methodologies and calculation approaches for absorption quantification in collaboration with monitoring measures for CO2 absorption and leakage.
Furthermore, the management of emission and fuel consumption data needs to be continuously upgraded and ensured for consistency to monitor data in real-time enhance management oversight efficiency, and simultaneously improve calculation and forecasting capabilities through AI integration.
|